Egyptian Birds, hand dyed wool on linen; two panels, each 9 x 9 in.
After writing a blog post about Egyptian Predynastic art, which you can see here, I thought I'd make a textile homage to the stone palettes of the period, which have such beautiful and graceful shapes. They are simple works, so to keep the textile simple I decided to use the technique of cutting the loops of wool to create a low relief effect. I've used this technique twice before––see one example at the end of this post––but not for a few years; it's good to be reminded of it. I hadn't originally planned on a two-panel work, but after finishing Purple Fowl, it seemed that it could use a companion, so I worked up some studies and settled on what became Turquoise Falcon. The problem is, I'm not satisfied with it; the shape doesn't please me, even though I liked the study.
Purple Fowl, hand dyed wool on linen, 9 x 9 in.
I enjoy the full curves of the form, narrowing to in a thin shape.
Purple Fowl, detail
In this detail, you can see how the cut loops look against the complete ones.
Turquoise Falcon, hand dyed wool on linen, 9 x 9 in.
This piece doesn't have the grace of the other for me; it looks too much like a map of Africa. Of course you can chime in with your opinions, as they're always welcome, but I think that the diptych Egyptian Birds is no more, and that only Purple Fowl remains.
Ovals (for Robert Mangold), hand dyed wool on linen, three panels, each 16 x 7 in.
I agree with you about Purple Fowl being the successful one here. It is so sensual that I wish I could touch it instead of just being able to see it. But that's where imagination comes in.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the corroborating comment, Julie. Everything is less in an online photo, but at least it enables that imagination to come into play.
DeletePeaceful 'eyecandy' to open this morning; the gentle curves within each shape, the calming color of the wool. The play with texture is sublime simplicity. Thank you for starting my day so pleasantly.
ReplyDeleteYou are very welcome, Sue; I'm pleased to have given you such a pleasant reaction.
DeleteWell I don't know, what if you just worked on the falcon a bit more? It seems that it's back is a bit too angular. Simplify, simplify.
ReplyDeleteit's too late for that, deborah, because of technical issues. I agree it's not simple enough.
Delete